skip to main | skip to sidebar

Interactive Democracy

Direct Democracy on the Internet

Thursday, 2 May 2013

The Key to Growth? Race with the Machines

Could Interactive Democracy be a super team that solves societies problems?

In this TED Talk, Erik Brynjolfsson, MIT Director of Digital Business, closes by saying

"The new machine age can be dated to a day 15 years ago when Gary Kasparov, the world chess champion, played Deep Blue, a supercomputer. The machine won that day, and today, a chess program running on a cell phone can beat a human grandmaster. It got so bad that, when he was asked what strategy he would use against a computer, Jan Donner, the Dutch grandmaster, replied, "I'd bring a hammer."
But today a computer is no longer the world chess champion. Neither is a human, because Kasparov organized a freestyle tournament where teams of humans and computers could work together, and the winning team had no grandmaster, and it had no supercomputer. What they had was better teamwork, and they showed that a team of humans and computers, working together, could beat any computer or any human working alone."

I suspect that internet technology facilitating a vast web of human experience could outperform any political expert or supercomputer. "Technology is not destiny. We shape our destiny."

Share |
Posted by About Interactive Democracy at Thursday, May 02, 2013
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Erik Brynjolfsson, Growth, Race With The Machines, TED

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments
About Interactive Democracy
This site seeks to contribute to the debate on improving democracy. The proposed "Interactive Democracy" system utilises Information Technology to allow anyone to suggest a policy by ePetition (Ideas Engine). Those with sufficient support would be refined by the elected Parliament, taking into account similar and opposing proposals, to form laws to be ratified by national referendum. The elected government is then responsible for implementing the new law or directive. Modern technology can facilitate this in a secure and cost effective manner. It can also enhance the debate by enabling the "pros" and "cons" to be aired and by allowing voters to pose questions. This system recognises that today's politicians have no mechanism for reliably discovering what the majority of their constituents think on any one issue and they may also be confounded in their ability to vote on their constituents behalf by the power of the party whips. Comments and questions are welcome. (The oldest post is at the bottom.)
View my complete profile

Search This Blog

Group

Google Groups
Subscribe to ID
Email:
Visit this group

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2014 (37)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2013 (21)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ▼  May (3)
      • The K Street Index
      • The Key to Growth? Race with the Machines
      • Character Assassination
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (83)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (16)
    • ►  May (14)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2011 (52)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2010 (120)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2009 (196)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (14)
    • ►  June (19)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2008 (65)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (27)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2007 (115)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (59)
    • ►  September (39)